rnaden
5788
Without
Oct 30, 2014,04:18 AM
...as in a decision I made last week when finally coming across one in good shape at good value.
Comments:
view entire thread
Without
By: rnaden : October 30th, 2014-04:18
...as in a decision I made last week when finally coming across one in good shape at good value.
Sorry, I like to have
By: senort75 : October 30th, 2014-05:09
the updated version, so I vote rolexrolexrolex. My TT Blue Sub from 2001 doesn't have the markings, and while I wouldn't sell it, I feel it's sort of in limbo. It's a dated version of the model, but not a vintage one.
wthout....
By: Baron - Mr Red : October 30th, 2014-09:01
....but then i am one of these guys who hates LV because it says LV
Thank you all
By: Arie - Mr Orange : October 31st, 2014-17:43
For replying. Much appreciated. Personally I feel without rolexrolexrolex suits a vintage Rolex more. Is this ref. a vintage? How many of this ref. have been made with and without the rolexrolexrolex? Does that play a role in its value (long run)? Things ...