All four examples shown here are superb on their own. If the criteria is based on the dial, then it is hard to beat the rich patina of no. 2 and 4. It creates such an amazing contrasts with the mirror dial and makes it very charming. That said, in this world that thrives on rarity, then no. 1 is an
This watch always bring a lot of pleasures whenever it is on my wrist. Nico, it's very nice to see The "Original" vs The "Tribute" alongside each other. Thank you. Cheers, Ken
Everything seemed perfectly harmonized and balanced on the 3940. A case of less is more that give rise to the elegant and timeless appeal. One never gets tire of looking at the sublime dial. In additon to what other Purists have already pointed out on the 5940, a minor flaw in my eyes would be the f
This watch remained at no. 1 on my short wish-list. It's such a striking and quality watch with incredible presence on the wrist. Enjoy the remaining of Summer. It's the opposite here in 'downunder' where we are coming to the end of a mild Winter. :-) Cheers, Ken
Nico, love the Explorer II 1655, but prices seemed to be very sharp at the moment. I have a slight preference for the straight-hand over the lollipop-hand, but both versions are winners in my book. Cheers, Ken
The Reverso rest very nicely on your wrist. I agree with you the shorter strap works well, but like you, would not go any shorter. The tail does overhang a bit on mine, that is why I'm considering the shorter strap. Unfortunately, I'm in between the two strap lengths which makes it a little difficul
Good to learn more about history behind the Homage to NR, which I do think is very nice. PS: I suspect its your passion in watch horology; astonishing how you continues to churn out these fantastic posts despite your busy schedules. Superhuman effort indeed, Bravo, my friend! Cheers, Ken
May I ask what your wrist circumference is? Mine is 6.7 inches / 17 cm. I'm pondering changing the standard croc strap on my TT 1948 to a shorter one. Thanks for your advice in advance. Cheers, Ken