Rolex' attitude, based on my recent experience with a triple six, could be summarised as follows: 'If we service the watch, we will decide what needs to be done in order to ensure that nothing will happen in the next two years; we will do this regardless of your wishes regarding preservation of pati
My first 'Rolex' was a Tudor, purchased in 1987. It was a Prince Quartz Oysterdate. (I didn't know much about watches in those days, hence the quartz!) It has huge sentimental value, so I was very disappointed to be told two years ago that the watch was no longer serviceable, and that there were no
14060 doesn't feature in the submariner e-brochure, but clearly it is still available and being distributed. I've been wearing my new 14060 for a few days now, and the look and dimensions seem 'natural' already.
Perhaps rumours of the demise of the 14060M are exaggerated. I bought one today with a random serial number that had only been sent to the AD on 22 Feb 2011. The 14060M is no longer on the Rolex web site. Any thoughts as to whether I've just bought a rare piece of Rolex history (as I imagine that if