A Review of the Tudor Monte Carlo ref. 7159

Nov 02, 2011,01:52 AM
 

The Tudor brand has been underestimated by watch collectors for years.  Nevertheless, the interest in some of their vintage models has been growing recently. In particular, people realize now how interesting the Monte Carlo chronographs are.  

 

The definition of a Monte Carlo dial is simply a two-tone dial used on early plexi Tudor Chronographs. The Tudor Monte Carlo received this nick name because of the resemblance of the dial to a roulette wheel in the gambling halls in the famous casino:

 



History 


The first Monte Carlo was lauched in 1970 under references 7031 and 7032 depending on the type of bezel: bakelite or a fixed metal. 7033 covers the prototype turnable bezel design seen in the new Monte Carlo re-edition. The dial has the “homeplate shaped” 5 sided lume dots and exists in a black or grey color.

 

 

The vintage Tudor 7033 and the 2010 Heritage re-edition

 

 

The 2010 Heritage re-edition and the vintage 7159

 

The watch is powered by a hand wound Valjoux 234 movement which is the Valjoux 23 with the date feature:

 

 

 

Valjoux 234 movement used in the Tudor Monte Carlo

 

The production of this references was stopped in 1972, so we can guess that the homeplate is a very rare watch.

 

From approx 1973, the next generation of the two registers arrived in 3 flavours: 

- 7149/0 Bakelite bezel. Blue or Black dial
- 7159/0 Fixed bezel. Usually black/grey dial.
- 7169/0 Turnable bezel design. Black or Blue dial

 

Again, these watches were only produces over a very short time period and we can guess that the production numbers are much lower than the Rolex Cosmograph for example.

 

The Watch in Detail 

 

My watch is a 7159/0. It is characterized by a massive 39mm case with a brushed finish metal bezel.

 

 

The winding crown and pushers are identical to the Rolex Cosmograph of the same era, but the watch is larger:

 

 

The thick crown guards surrounding the winding crown add to the character and bulkiness of the case:

 

 

 

The cyclop on the plexi is usually seen at three o clock on the Submariner to magnify the date. It is located at six o clock on this watch and to my eyes it gives a lot of vintage charm to the piece. It also sort of balances the dial, which has the metal shield on top and the two subdials on each side.

 

 

The flat caseback has the specific “Tudor by Rolex” engraving:

 

 

The dial is very colourful and has a lot of nice 1970’s details to look at. This is the main difference between the Tudor Monte Carlo and the Rolex Cosmograph, which had a much more classical and conventional design.

 

 

 

 

The bracelet is a folded Rolex Oyster ref. 7836, that is also used on the Rolex GMT master.

 

 

 

Documents

 

Here are some original brochures showing some Monte Carlo models. Their design prove that these watches were aimed at a younger clientele than the Rolex models.

 

 

I can feel a real sense of humor here….do you feel it too ?

 

 


 

Acknowledgements: Morgan King, Aakviper



More posts: 6542703271497159GMT MasterMonte CarloSubmarinerTudorTudor Chronograph

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Clealry an underestimated watch.

 
 By: grigo : November 2nd, 2011-04:26
Thanks for the great post, I feel I learned a lot about this watch that I did not know and now have a better comprehension of the brand. Best regards, George

Thanks. Nowadays it's quite sought after [nt]

 
 By: DrStrong : November 3rd, 2011-03:10
No message body

A great seventies watch!

 
 By: fernando : November 2nd, 2011-06:02
Just as stunning today with that big block look. I didn't realize it was manual by looking at the thick casing but I guess that makes it all the more special. Thanks for the review! F

very nice watch...

 
 By: MattS : November 2nd, 2011-06:51
and very refreshing post! thanks Jeff Matt

Merci Matt ! [nt]

 
 By: DrStrong : November 3rd, 2011-05:12
No message body

Great Review! Thank You Dr. nt

 
 By: SALMANPK : November 2nd, 2011-08:56
nt

My pleasure Salman [nt]

 
 By: DrStrong : November 3rd, 2011-07:52
No message body

Great post

 
 By: Ubik : November 2nd, 2011-08:57
Always liked the vintage Monte Carlo - a really unique look.

Thanks Ubik [nt]

 
 By: DrStrong : November 3rd, 2011-05:15
No message body

Jeff...something special about the MC

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : November 2nd, 2011-10:01
I know exactly what you mean....my MC is with a watchmaker...has been for over a year as my missing parts need to be found (sub-index). I have got them sourced but havent picked up. The MC is a much sportier watch than its cousin the Dayto...not sure why,... 

Now we need a review of yours ;-) [nt]

 
 By: DrStrong : November 3rd, 2011-03:09
No message body

Tudor Question

 
 By: db darien : November 2nd, 2011-12:33
Long before I became a watch fanatic, I worked in NYC and would, on occasion, visit Tourneau to get some jewelry, change a watch battery (quartz...eeek!!) or get my wife a birthday or anniversary present (my wife bought me my first decent watch -- a steel... 

Tudor was owned by Rolex...

 
 By: DrStrong : November 3rd, 2011-03:03
I'm not sure about their current situation. It was kind of a "low cost" Rolex, with the same cases but less sophisticated movements. They have experimented very cool and creative designs over the years. Some have a very interesting military history....  

According to Ebay, Tudor is Owned by Rolex...

 
 By: db darien : November 3rd, 2011-06:25
Direct Quote: "In 1905 Wilsdorf set up his own company in England and began producing high quality watches. It was in 1908 that he began the Rolex brand. He ran the business in England for about fifteen years and then moved to Geneva in 1920. "Hans Wilsdo... 

Thanks Jeff

 
 By: Guillaume Seventies : November 2nd, 2011-14:22
Thanks for this splendid post. I still wonder why people think that having Tudor in a collection is not a good thing. Fortunately, you're here to prove otherwise. So informative. Guillaume

Interesting review, Jeff.

 
 By: amanico : November 2nd, 2011-14:37
I must confess that I'm more and more interested by this Chrono. Which one? One like yours seems to be a good compromise, while the Ref 7032 is my first choice. SS bezel, in all cases, please, for me. Mechanically speaking, it is not inferior o the Rolex ... 

Merci mon ami ! [nt]

 
 By: DrStrong : November 3rd, 2011-03:12
No message body

Nice review

 
 By: ijl : November 5th, 2011-00:45
Thank you for this review. I must say, this watch opened my eyes even more so to the tudor. I liked it so much i tried it on my wrist during my last purchase but decided to go with another watch instead. It is a very sporty without being so loud IMO. chee... 

Fantastic review Thanks

 
 By: Bill : November 7th, 2011-12:06
I nearly got my hands on one of these not to long ago. I really had not considered them very much in the past but I am warming up very much to the idea. Thanks for a great review Jeff. Bill

My pleasure Bill ! [nt]

 
 By: DrStrong : November 8th, 2011-04:00
No message body

I always come back to this review of the Rolex Tudor 7159

 
 By: Bill : August 28th, 2015-14:39
And it is a great read time and time again. Bill

This is a very interesting watch, and not only for aesthetical reasons.

 
 By: amanico : August 28th, 2015-14:53
Time for me to prepare something, on this one... ;) Best, Nicolas

Well said!

 
 By: amanico : August 28th, 2015-22:26