Rolex 1665 - The Rail Dial

Dec 25, 2018,13:10 PM
 

The 1665 Double Red Sea-Dweller (DRSD) has a very broad following amongst vintage Rolex collectors. There are entire websites devoted to the history, details and intricacies of this great watch. Produced for a decade (1967-77) with a multiple of dial and detail variations. It has captured the imagination of the vintage collector. The DRSD, however, has overshadowed a number of other great watches of the same genre.


Most obviously, I am talking about the 1665 Great White. I hunted a Great White “Rail Dial” (GWRD) for a couple of years. I wanted an early and original version with its full package of box and punched papers. Over the same time period, I was also hunting a DRSD Mk3 and DRSD Mk4. I found plenty of examples of the Mk4. The Mk3, of course, is much harder to find. I would say that the GWRD is about as rare as the DRSD Mk3. So, in terms of rarity, the GWRD is an unusual watch. But I think it is sexier than many of the DRSDs for a number of reasons. I would say it is time for the Great White to come out from the shadows of its Red Brother.


The GWRD was released in 1977, undergoing a makeover from the 1665 DRSD Mk4. The 1570 movement stayed the same (indeed all 1665s kept the 1570 movement with hack mechanism). However, the text “SUBMARINER 2000” was removed from the dial, leaving just “SEA-DWELLER”. This evolution of the Sea-Dweller is interesting. Is it a subset of the Submariner reference or is it a reference with its own unique identity? Well, I think it started as a subset of the Submariner group but evolved with its own very unique identity. One no longer thinks of the Sea-Dweller as a Submariner. When the Sea-Dweller was first launched, it is likely that Rolex needed to differentiate it from the standard Submariner, but wanted to attach some of the Submariner commercial appeal to the Sea-Dweller. Hence, at birth, the Sea-Dweller did not have a distinct lineage. The name “Submariner” sat on the dial.


The 1665 Great White was the first Sea-Dweller to actually drop “Submariner” from its dial. Well, actually, that is not 100% accurate. The very first prototype patent pending, nicknamed the “Single Red” did not carry the “Submariner” line, but since there is only one or two of such examples, it is reasonable to say that the first production watch to carry just “Sea-Dweller” was the Great White. One could argue that the watch’s evolution from being part of the Submariner Group to being a Sea-Dweller became crystalised with the Great White when the Submariner name was dropped from the dial.


Like its predecessor, the Great White came with a number of dial varieties. Most experts would say that there are 4 different dial varieties. However, thanks to Chris, on this forum, it now seems that there are five, with Chris showing an example of the Mk0 – the “Big White”. I attach a link here to Chris’s original article.


rolex.watchprosite.com


Here is a scan of the “Big White”, with the first line of text clearly over-hanging the second line of text (overhang marked in red by me). The “Big White” came in a very narrow serial range (5175XXX), pre-dating the Mk1 dial. The Mk0 dial was manufactured by Lemrich & Cie.

 





The Mk1 dial came on a serial number in the 5.2-5.7m range but also occasionally from 5.9-6.1m. The text “2000ft – 610m” was written in non-italic font, similar to the DRSD Mk4. The marking at 6 o’clock is also written as  SWISS – T < 25, which differentiates it from the subsequent Mk 2 dial. The Mk1 dial was manufactured by Beyeler.


Picture courtesy of Mondani

Picture courtesy of Mondani




Excluding the Mk0, the Mk2 dial is the rarest configuration. The configuration of the wording SUPERLATIVE CHRONOMETER OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED creates a symmetry between the first two and last two words, leading to what has come to be known as the “Rail Dial” (sorry for my red addition!). Such a configuration can be found across other references (ie the 1655) so is not exclusive to the Sea-Dweller. However, it is the only Sea-Dweller reference to have this trait....other than Comex...(you see Nicolas, a Rail Dial theme gets more complex!)


Picture courtesy of Mondani
Picture courtesy of Mondani

Another factor that differentiates the Mk2 dial is the 6 o’clock marker which is T SWISS T < 25. Again, this is the only Great White dial variant that has this specific format.


Although one can never be 100% certain on serial ranges, I think it is comfortable to assume that the “Rail Dial” is typically found in a range of 5.7-6.0m.


There are other small variations specific to the Mk2 dial. For example, the style of the “6” in 610m is different in the Mk2 compared with the Mk1. In the Mk1, the 6 is an open 6, whereas in the Mk2 the 6 is closed. It is also correct to say that the font style for Mk2 onwards becomes italicised. Other small variations of this dial include the fact that the hour markers are closer to the minute track than in other dials and the minute markers are somewhat longer too.


One last nugget for the Mk2 is that the dial was manufactured by the Stern Company who also made the 600m Comex dials for the 1665 between 1977-79. There is a rich history to the “Rail Dial” for sure. Stern is also responsible for other Rolex Rail Dials (the 1655 for example). However, establishing this link between Comex and the Great White makes it very cool to my mind given the diving nature of both watches.


The Mk 3 dial has some subtleties too. The Rolex coronet has sharper (or at least more pointed) tips, and the depth rating has a slightly different font with the “ft” and “m” smaller than in the Mk2 dial. Mk3 dials were manufactured by Beyeler.


Picture courtesy of Mondani

Picture courtesy of Mondani


The Mk4 dial is very similar to the Mk3 with one or two minor differences. For example, the “r” in the word Oyster comes directly under the base of the “R” in “Rolex” above it, whereas in the Mk3, the Oyster “R” is displaced more to the left. One last minor difference is that the hyphen between “Sea-Dweller” is shorter in the Mk4 than in the Mk3. Mk4 dials were manufactured by Lemrich & Cie. The last year of production for the Mk4 before being discontinued was 1982. At least, this was the last time that the 1665 featured for sale in the Rolex catalog. 


Picture courtesy of Mondani

Picture courtesy of Mondani


So, these are the dial variants and some of the history of the watch. Now to focus on the watch itself. In particular, the Rail Dial version which, to my mind, is as sexy as many of the DRSDs. The thing with most Sea-Dwellers is their prominence on the wrist. They sit more proudly than the Subs. Now, I don’t mean to infer that they are awkward or bulky. It isn’t that at all. In the same way that a Rottweiler stands in a somewhat prouder manner to a Labrador……that is more appropriate.










The 1665 will always hold a key place in Rolex history thanks to the Helium Escape Valve innovation. Rolex, through Comex, helped develop the first diving watch for saturation diving. At the time of release, the 1665 was not especially successful from a commercial standpoint. In those days, watch fashion was for smaller watches. The thicker case for the 1665 along with its design aimed specifically for professional divers did not make it such an obvious choice for an everyday watch. Of course, a similar story is so often true for so many watches that go on to become desirable to collectors. In today’s world of more fashionable bigger watches, the 40mm case on the Great White is now fairly average. With its super-cool domed plexi, it has a truly vintage look. The watch is, after all, 35 years old. Yet, with the 1570 movement it remains extremely reliable and robust. It is always hard to be definitive, but if I was to select a vintage watch to be a daily wearer, I think the Great White Rail Dial would be my choice.


It is true that the DRSDs get all the limelight. But actually, while that may be justifiable for some of the earlier DRSDs, it is hard to believe that the Great White Rail Dial is not one  of the more highly desirable parts of the 1665 stable, with some unique features and great historical links. For me, the link with Comex and the fact that the Great White is the first Rolex to carry just “Sea-Dweller” makes it cool. The link with other Rail Dials such as the 1655 also makes it interesting. Again, that presence on the wrist is another attraction….and lets not forget the Helium valve…..  Definitely one for the Cool Wall. 


Uhmmm…a Cool Wall…..a Rolex Cool Wall…..there’s an idea. Great White Rail Dial starts the Cool Wall theme and I am placing it firmly in the cool sector.








More posts: 165516655514Comexdouble RedExplorer IIgreat whiteSea DwellerSubmariner

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Insane???

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : June 3rd, 2013-00:02
Uhm...... I guess you are right!

LOL !

 
 By: flamenco : June 3rd, 2013-00:09
Like Ed, I can never keep track as well ... Although it makes for an interesting read. Not to mention the passion exuded by Rolex collectors ! The question is, who discovers this "differences" and how does this get proliferated !?!

Very informative

 
 By: Aless156 : June 3rd, 2013-00:10
Thanks for the analysis. I love the white 1665.

A superb reference post, my friend.

 
 By: amanico : June 3rd, 2013-00:11
I didn't know all these details about the Great Whit, or about the SD RD ( Rail Dial ). It is great to have all these details in the same article, especially for those who are hunting this watch. A superb reference post, Baron. Bravo. Nicolas.

Thanks Nicolas

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : June 3rd, 2013-00:14
I think what is interesting is finding out new or at least different angles to the watch. I love the Stern link to the Comex Rail Dial for example.....and the Sea-Dweller name appearing uniquely.....these things make the watch history richer and a big par... 

Wow great review !

 
 By: DrStrong : June 3rd, 2013-00:23
thanks a lot for sharing your research about this fascinating watch

Great timing!

 
 By: vernon : June 3rd, 2013-01:15
Thanks for a great and informative article. I've also been swayed by the charms of the Rail Dial - I don't know what it is about the layout but it just looks right to me. A double red is probably out of my reach but a nice Rail would do me just fine and t... 

Hi Vernon...

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : June 3rd, 2013-01:27
I really don't think you will be disappointed with any of the Great Whites.......good hunting

Bravo Baron!

 
 By: ESE 2A : June 3rd, 2013-01:39
Very nice topic!!! If i could correct something, i would say about the rail dial, that the range is 5.7-5.8 (but you can find it even on 6.2) Ciao ;)

Yes, i have seen that it can come in 6.2....

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : June 3rd, 2013-01:50
......but if i am honest, i am only truly comfortable in a 5.70X - 5.99Xm range. I am not saying you are wrong as who knows for sure how Rolex fitted their dials with consistency....but I would say I would much prefer my Rail Dial fo fall between 5.7-6.0m... 

the widely accepted range ...

 
 By: marcello pisani : September 8th, 2014-06:14
for rail ( mk2 ) dial is 5.7 - 6.2.

Did you ever hear about 500 pieces only, Marcello?

 
 By: amanico : September 8th, 2014-06:17
Well, by " hear ", I mean facts. ;) Best, Amico. Nicolas

I can just give my opinion ...

 
 By: marcello pisani : September 8th, 2014-07:13
and not " facts " as the Lake has allways been quite contrary to give production numbers. we could reason in this way considering that : 1) in the 5.7 - 6.2 range there are 8 batches of 1665 ; 2) the elapsed time is around 24 months ; 3) in the same case ... 

a lot less Rails than i had expected

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : September 8th, 2014-08:39

well at that time ....

 
 By: marcello pisani : September 8th, 2014-09:39
1665 was not really a commercial success ..... a really specialized watch .... with an higher price than 1680/5513 ... made in a very very lower number than the damned cosmographs screw-down pushers. still underestimated also in the " standard version " .... 

I waited for ages to find mine....

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : September 8th, 2014-09:44
......gladly managed to do so...B&P an added bonus. And today, I a "smug" Joe

LOL, yes, very wise!

 
 By: amanico : September 8th, 2014-11:11

Well Baron, I am flabergasted:) how one would....

 
 By: Sandgroper : June 3rd, 2013-01:39
discover that a hyphen between Sea and Dweller is shorter or longer, that the R of Oyster is directly placed under the base of the R of Rolex or otherwise is AMAZING!! Almost like looking for a needle in a haystack. I guess that MUST be the definition of ... 

Hey Francois...

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : June 3rd, 2013-01:47
.....the Single Red is the one that you are talking about? Well, its not that they produced only one.....i think it may be 2 or so....but these watches were prototypes. Rolex wanted to develop a saturation diving watch so produced a number of prototypes t... 

No no, I am talking about the Great White, the one...

 
 By: Sandgroper : June 3rd, 2013-02:30
you are describing, you write " The Mk1 dial came on a serial number in the 5.2-5.7m range but also occasionally from 5.9-6.1m" is the "m" for million? Cheers Francois

ah yes....

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : June 3rd, 2013-02:45
so 5200000....5.2m yes

Hmmmm! Thank you :)

 
 By: Sandgroper : June 3rd, 2013-03:02
Cheers, Francois

Thanks Mod...

 
 By: gensiulia : June 3rd, 2013-01:46
...a cornerstone for a lover of the most fascinating Rolex ref. ave, chris

Cheers Ken

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : June 3rd, 2013-03:07
Its good to give this reference its correct status!

Fantastic post dear Baron! Makes for an interesting reading...

 
 By: Subexplorer : June 3rd, 2013-05:17
... and a great reference guide! I appreciate all the work which you took to gather all this material, photos, and info! GREAT! Thank you so much and receive my best cordial regards, Abel.

Well....

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : June 3rd, 2013-05:41
.....it is quite easy to take pictures of a watch I love owning. I am pleased you like it....

Amazing reference post, and great close ups and markers to...

 
 By: DivingT : June 3rd, 2013-12:39
....illustrate the very subtle, but key differences. I love these types of post. Fantastic, well done Joe. Thanks for sharing. Cheers Tony

Great and detailed report

 
 By: Bill : June 3rd, 2013-20:47
It is clear you have a soft spot for this model. Best Bill

a small one [nt]

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : June 4th, 2013-00:35

A very interesting and informative post!

 
 By: fernando : June 4th, 2013-06:41
Just one question: Will it still be called a great white if all the indices and hands have turned a dark yellow colour. :) Just happened to see one in such a condition. cheers fernando

Excellent article

 
 By: cmclee : June 4th, 2013-06:57
probably the most complete by far.. thanks for sharing ! here's my MK4. ...  

great write up

 
 By: Ryan5446 : June 4th, 2013-10:19
thanks ! Here is my humble contribution ...  

I love that type of humility!!!

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : June 4th, 2013-10:25
A killer duo.....quite perfect

Humble, humble... Would you consider an humble trade between your humble watches

 
 By: amanico : June 4th, 2013-11:04
And my humble ones? :) :) :) SUPERB, Steven... Best, my friend. Nicolas

hell yes! [nt]

 
 By: gensiulia : June 4th, 2013-12:28

Thank you for the education, Baron!

 
 By: blomman Mr Blue : June 5th, 2013-00:13
And congrats to a great watch! :) Best, my friend Blomman

brilliant sunday!

 
 By: gensiulia : June 9th, 2013-06:51
...  

Amazing scholarship, Baron...

 
 By: descartes1 : September 10th, 2014-07:19
It is this sort of analysis that makes vintage collecting so interesting IMO. While I do love new/newer models too, any person can walk into a retail store and buy what's in the case. It is far more interesting to look at collecting with something other t... 

Great report

 
 By: FrancisV : September 8th, 2014-06:57
Thank you for your dedication and time in producing such an in depth review. Kind regards

So glad I miseed that article first time around

 
 By: Ares501 - Mr Green : December 25th, 2018-14:21
What a Xmas night treat reading this was! Superb post by all means.... learned so much about SD history. Cheers D

A beauty!!! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : December 25th, 2018-23:08

Great write up-- thanks--- my 5.7 Rail.

 
 By: pastaboy1939 : December 26th, 2018-05:43
...