watch-er
1745
my only comment
Nov 29, 2014,07:23 AM
is I wish the steel models would have the wonderful legibility/contrast of the markers in the sub dials as the gold models have. Especially with the steel black dial, I simply cannot read the elapsed time as the minute marks have so little contrast. The blue dial on the steel/gold or all gold is very clear and readable so they can do it.
Comments:
view entire thread
Stainless Steel Daytona, still the standard
By: sanzaw : November 19th, 2014-22:36
Couldn't help but snap a wristshot while waiting for a flight. Been through AP's, Panerais, and a variety of Rolexes. The Stainless Steel Daytona holds a sacred place in my heart. Largely unchanged since the movement update in 2000, unaffected by the cera...
Nice wristshot!
By: fai9al_429 : November 19th, 2014-23:02
I couldn't agree more with what you've mentioned about the mighty Daytona!!!
my only comment
By: watch-er : November 29th, 2014-07:23
is I wish the steel models would have the wonderful legibility/contrast of the markers in the sub dials as the gold models have. Especially with the steel black dial, I simply cannot read the elapsed time as the minute marks have so little contrast. The b...
Agree
By: sanzaw : December 1st, 2014-07:53
It's a deliberate ploy from Rolex to get us staring at the Daytona dial longer that needed! I agree, it takes some tilting about to see the exact minutes elapsed, though I must say getting used to the graduation marks almost allows me to get a good idea o...