SBS,to me very cent counts!

Jul 31, 2007,03:48 AM
 

Hi SBS,

Completely understand your demand and criteria in search of the true "in house" movement.Everyone in this big horology circle is searching for the answer.
Manufacturers are sturggling to cope with collectors demand and intention.This i view it as a micro topic behind the sales and demand of economy.Here it involve with arts and collectibility too.
Which manufacturer dares to admitt a full 100% in house movement.Even those independent with limited fund in R&D and etc,rely most in other huge supplier's supply in parts,in order to bring their cost down.
Big guys tends to have more parts produce themselves but still rely on many other parts suppliers.You can just predict to what extend how many percentage are produce in house.
And in my opinion there are none of the manufacturer really are true 100% able to produce 100% in house  regardless of movement,casing and etc.
To me,in order enter the noble gate of my collection house.The criteria would be nearly 100% in house movement would do but weighting it in terms of,limited pieces,process behind the product,rarity,and price is vital.In fact it is  not perpendicular,they can produce everything in the top of quality must go along with their cost inccur.Contraryily,you can not expect them to produce something which consume time,man power in R&D and production in a cheap manner.But in the wild world of horology,markets is competitie and demanding price friendly product.So,here lots of manufacturer will have entry level and middle class and top notch products.
After turning all over the horology real life circle in serach of the ultimate answer, i derive at this juncture a solution to my standard or guide-line in purchasing a time piece,
i)Buy sport-luxury wrist watch which set a a lower fix price leve,here it varies individually.(usually sport luxury watch are more on design base and trendy wave)therefore collectibility is low.Just in this category of watches are simply irressistable their evolution keep our temptation high.
II)Buy collectible watch usually are those  in a higher fix price level,again here it varies individually.These are items tends to be keep for generation and withstand the changes of all sorts of humman factors.

I think you would not go wrong.In this world nearly everything would goes that way.YOU PAY FOR WHAT YOU GET!
I hope my little think thank would help you a little if not alot.

Thanks.



Warm regards,
BHK9

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Thoughts on "in-house" movements and their reflection of the watch maker?

 
 By: Watch_time_it_is : July 30th, 2007-12:45
Clearly the discussion on in-house movements in less about accuracy and more about something else. Quartz is more accurate and as such would appear to be the right decision for buying the most "accurate" watch. Given this, the purchase of mechanical watch... 

Why I'm getting to like clocks...

 
 By: nickd : July 31st, 2007-00:25
I actually can't get too worked up about the issue of in-house movements. What counts for me is how well it keeps time and how rugged it is. Most of my watches don't even have display backs. Start with the actual design process. The tiny independant is pr... 

Your criteria for an in-house movement seem to point to …

 
 By: ticktock : July 31st, 2007-03:43
a surprising choice, one that many collectors do not yet fully appreciate. It's made in-house, assembled individually by master watchmakers, has contributed a huge chunk of innovation to the industry and if judged only by its timekeeping, it is one of the... 

Seiko and Rolex...

 
 By: nickd : July 31st, 2007-04:44
If 100% in-house is the major concern, then Seiko makes the most parts in-house (everything I believe - someone correct me). If you want accuracy as well then the Grand Seiko is the answer. Otherwise, Rolex makes just about everything, and you likewise ge... 

true manufacture

 
 By: dardo1 : August 6th, 2007-20:22